Whoops, you're coming at if from the wrong side!

Most attempts to “unify physics” start from the wrong end.

They assume a pre-existing lattice, a fixed grid, or a background geometry waiting to be populated.

But nothing about a lattice explains why it should exist at all,

or why it should hold the specific irrational tensions that define real measurements.

It smuggles in the answer before asking the question.

What I’ve been exploring is much simpler:

Start from the origin.

Not as a point in space, but as the first act of selection —

the moment consciousness chooses a reference.

From that single choice, you get the first line.

From that line, you get the first circle.

From the circle, you get the Genesis pattern:

each expansion a harmonic, each new dimension a new degree of freedom.

And here’s the key:

If each dimensional step is computed sequentially — not all at once —

you don’t get a perfect symmetric collapse.

You get a spiral.

You get aliasing.

You get gravity.

The tension between rational steps and irrational relationships

(√2, φ, π, all the usual suspects)

isn’t a mathematical inconvenience —

it is the curvature.

It is the warping.

A dimension isn’t a container.

It’s the side-effect of computing one more relationship than before.

As the pattern expands, the geometry hits thresholds:

simplex → tetrahedron → cube → dodecahedron → and so on.

Once the pattern becomes too complex to maintain a simultaneous global solution,

the universe “collapses” to the next best local approximation,

digit by digit.

That collapse is time.

That tension is gravity.

And the fact that the computation cannot be done in all directions at once

is why the universe spirals rather than loops perfectly.

This isn’t a final theory —

but it’s the right place to start one.

Not with a lattice that magically exists,

but with the first decision that creates it.